Happy December. This will undoubtedly be my last message of the year.

My October column for Skeptical Inquirer, “‘Have You Seen My Wallet?’ Civic Honesty around the Globe,” was a bit of good news. According to a remarkably ambitious field experiment conducted in forty countries, people are more altruistic than you might think. The authors of the study turned in over 17,000 “lost” wallets at reception desks at museums, public offices, or other institutions. The wallets contained either no money at all or the equivalent of US$13.45, and the “owner’s” email address was clearly displayed. The crucial measure was contacting the owner (actually, the experimenters) or not. Contrary to standard economic theory, people virtually everywhere were MORE likely to contact someone they thought was the owner if the wallet contained money than if it didn’t. Not what the experimenters expected, but good news nonetheless. One country took issue with their results in the study, but I will leave that episode for you to discover in the article.

A modern ECT machine.

My latest “Behavior & Belief” column, “Profound Autism and Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Neglected Resource,” is on the use of ECT with children whose severe behavior has not responded to other therapies. It features the story of Amy S. F. Lutz and her son Jonah, who greatly benefited from ECT. In Jonah’s case, the improvement in his behavior after ECT meant the difference between being institutionalized and continuing to live at home. Unfortunately, ECT’s scary reputation, fostered by films such as One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, has led to severe restrictions in some states, which means that many families whose children might benefit from ECT have difficulty accessing it.

That’s it for 2025. I hope you have a wonderful holiday season, and may 2026 be a better year for us all.

SV

Welcome to autumn. The calendar says that summer is over, but here in New England, we are enjoying a warm spell. The swimming has been some of the best of the year.

My September “Behavior & Belief” column for Skeptical Inquirer is “Improving Psychological Science Through Adversarial Collaboration.” It is not uncommon for researchers to study the same topic and come to completely different conclusions. Rather than looking for a way to bridge these gaps, researchers often dig in and design studies that support their pet theories. Thankfully, a new technique, adversarial collaboration, has the potential to move researchers away from their opposing positions and closer to the truth. This movement is still quite new, but it is a very positive development.

And now for something a little different. Last week, I came across a photo that sent me on a sentimental journey about someone who briefly passed through my life over fifty years ago. I memorialized that interlude in a short essay on Medium called “One That Got Away.” 

If you want to go down a similar sentimental path, I recommend this version of the Tom Waits song “Martha” by Lisa Hannigan. It was performed live in Dublin on New Year’s Eve, 2012. The pianist is Cormac Curran. It is a wonderful song, and Hannigan’s version is—in my opinion—even better than the original. It makes me cry every time.

That’s all for now.

SV

These few news items mark the end of the Summer of 2025.

My July column for Skeptical Inquirer was a look back at two related bits of irrationality: the Hot Hand and the Gambler’s Fallacy, both of which are based on the mistaken belief that independent events are not independent. Recent research suggests that, with respect to the Hot Hand—the belief that certain athletes get “hot” and can’t seem to miss—the athletes were right all along and the scientists were wrong.

Although the date slipped past without my noticing it, back in December of 2024, I clocked ten years writing for Skeptical Inquirer magazine. Once I noticed the anniversary, I wrote a column to memorialize the event. Writing for SI has been one of the great joys of my career. As long as I am able, I hope to keep writing the “Behavior & Belief” column.

I am writing this on August 24, undeniably the last few days of summer. Labor Day weekend is a week away. For the last several days, I’ve been singing John Prine’s song, Summer’s End. I wanted to include a YouTube video of the song in this message, and I watched several versions before making a choice. As beautiful as the song is, it is quite sad, and I cannot watch these videos without crying. The “come on home” chorus brings out the emotions every time. Finally, I chose this arrangement by Irish singers Paul Noonan, Lisa Hannigan, and Gemma Hayes. They divide the parts nicely and sing in wonderful harmony.

S

I am particularly fond of several lines of the song, for example, this couplet:

Well, you never know how far from home you’re feelin’
Until you’ve watched the shadows cross the ceilin’

And this final verse:

The moon and stars hang out in bars just talkin’
I still love that picture of us walkin’
Just like that ol’ house we thought was haunted
Summer’s end came faster than we wanted

I hope you squeeze as much joy as possible out of these last days of summer.

SV

It is the midsummer of our discontent, and I have just a few items to report.

Ky Dickens

William James

In my June column for Skeptical Inquirer, “Ky Dickens, William James, and the Four Possibilities,” I revealed a surprising parallel between the dilemmas faced by the host and director of The Telepathy Tapes podcast and the early American psychologist. There is at least one important difference between the two: for Dickens, telepathy is a huge plus; for James, it was a major minus.

On June 26, I  had the privilege of guest-hosting an episode of Skeptical Inquirer Presents in which the Cambridge University psychologist Sander van der Linden talked about how to combat misinformation. Van der Linden is one of the top researchers in this field and has worked with both governments and social media companies to improve our information environment. He is the author of a terrific book, Foolproof: Why Misinformation Infects Our Minds and How to Build Immunity. Although I’m on record as not being sold on the immunity metaphor, it is undeniable that van der Linden is doing excellent and important work on a topic that couldn’t be more urgent. You can watch his presentation here.

Finally, I wrote an unusual piece for me—an art review of the exhibit “Little Beasts: Art, Wonder, and the Natural World” at the National Gallery of Art in Washington, DC. I managed to catch this remarkable exhibit while in Washington over Memorial Day weekend, and Skeptical Inquirer was kind enough to publish my brief rave review.

That’s it for now. Try to stay cool. My old folks’ summer swimming group, The Stonington Loons, is fully engaged. I will leave you with a photo of some of us plying our way through Stonington (CT) Harbor. One of those heads is mine, but it is up to you to figure out which one.

SV

A quick note on the eve of June. Although it is not officially summer and the weather is still rainy and cool here in New England, I’m in a summery mood.

The Telepathy Tapes is the gift that keeps on giving. In a Skeptical Inquirer extra, I reveal how the producers of the wildly successful but thoroughly pseudoscientific podcast attempted to silence one of their critics—but failed. Janyce Boynton, a former facilitator turned advocate against the use of facilitated communication, operates the YouTube channel FCisNotScience, and since the arrival of the Telepathy Tapes podcast, she has been producing analyses of some of the videos posted on the podcast’s website. Boynton’s videos show how the nonspeaking people could easily be controlled by their facilitators. In a bullying move, the podcast producers leveled a copyright strike against Boynton, but with the help of pro bono legal support, she fought back and won.

Over the Memorial Day weekend, I spoke at the annual convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis International in Washington, DC. The title of my talk was “Identity, Advocacy, & Autism Pseudoscience,” which is a topic I have been speaking about for the last year. Unfortunately, there is no publicly available video of the talk, but I can share a picture of me at the podium courtesy of my son, Graham Vyse.

As many of you know, I have an interest in 19th-century spiritualism. For quite some time, I have been trying to get access to the archives of the American Society for Psychical Research in New York City with no luck. Recently, I took a deep dive into the goings-on at the ASPR, and what I discovered was shocking. My May column for Skeptical Inquirer recounts “The Demise of the American Society for Psychical Research.” A sad tale.

That’s all for now.

SV

Here in New England, spring has finally arrived with sunny skies and warm temperatures. The political world is a nightmare, but good weather helps. It has been a while since I bothered you with a report of my latest activities, so here are just a few items.

I have published two articles for Skeptical Inquirer in recent months. The first was entitled “Worse Than Murder on Fifth Avenue,” which is a reference to the president’s famous statement that he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose any supporters. I discuss his use of various lies and bullshit and argue they have done far more harm than a single fatality in New York City.

My most recent article is an interview with an old hero of mine. C. Eugene Emery was a longtime reporter for the Providence Journal newspaper back in the heyday of that august publication, often covering the science and pseudoscience beat. He has also worked for Reuters news agency and, more recently, PolitiFact. In addition to all that, in the 1990s, he wrote a “Media Watch” column for Skeptical Inquirer magazine, critiquing various alien abduction cable news shows and other paranormal content. As life would have it, in the 1970s and 80s, I lived in Providence and was a subscriber to the ProJo. Long before I knew what skepticism was, I was a fan of Gene’s work, but I had never met him. This interview gave me a chance to make contact and get to know Gene a bit. He is a great guy who has made important contributions to the fight for science and against misinformation, superstition, and fraud.

Finally, I had the pleasure of appearing on Brian Kerby’s public access television show, 502 Conversations, to talk about the wildly popular podcast, The Telepathy Tapes, which purports to show evidence that nonspeaking people with autism have psychic abilities. Brian’s show is very well produced with clips from the Telepathy Tapes interspersed to make the conversation more understandable. I thoroughly enjoyed myself.

That’s it for now. I hope you get a chance to get outside and enjoy the springtime.

SV

Since my last missive, Donald Trump has been inaugurated as the 47th President of the United States, and I have returned from a trip to California. I leave it to you to judge which of these events is more important.

I had a wonderful visit to Los Angeles. I spent time with my dear friends Hank Schlinger, Alex Hybel, and their families, and I gave a talk at the Center for Inquiry West. At CFI West, I got to spend some time with the amazing Executive Director, James Underdown. It was quite a thrill.

My talk was entitled, “The Latest in Autism Claptrap,” and it is now available on YouTube. Among other things, I covered the immensely popular Telepathy Tapes podcast. See below. I enjoyed using the word claptrap in the title of the talk, but more importantly, it was an honor to give a presentation in CFI West’s Carl Sagan and Ann Druyan Theater. Carl Sagan was the greatest inspiration for my interest in skepticism, and he remains a model of how to present science to the general public,

My latest article for Skeptical Inquirer, “Why I’m Not Sold on Mental Immunity,” may earn me

some blowback. Mental Immunity is a new theory of how we defend against misinformation and fake news, but in my opinion, it is not supported by evidence. The supporters of mental immunity theory are aimed at a noble goal, the rejection of misinformation, but I believe it is important to speak the truth. As of this moment, there is no evidence of a mental immunity system. I argue that the mental immunity theory is a metaphor in search of an anchor in reality. We shall see what others say.

I leave you with some pictures from my trip to California.

My friends Alex & Jan Hybel

Hank Schlinger is both a psychologist and a remarkably talented musician.

That’s it for now. Happy Spring.

SV

2025 began with a bang. The pseudoscience of the enormously popular podcast The Telepathy Tapes inspired me to write my first column of the year for Skeptical Inquirer on the topic. The premise of the podcast is that many severely disabled people with autism have psychic abilities. The hitch is that their telepathy is revealed through the discredited communication technique known as spelling to communicate. The quality of investigation presented in the show is quite poor, but the podcast is likely to promote false and potentially dangerous methods of communication. Not a good beginning to the year.

Back in December, I wrote on a lighter topic, “Fear of Flying and the Search for Gate 13.” Of course, we know that many buildings skip the thirteenth floor due to superstition, but it is less well known that many airports also avoid Gate 13. Some people are nervous about flying, and it appears that the designers of many—though not all—airports have sought to reduce the fear of flying by skipping Gate 13. In the article, I interviewed a man who took it upon himself to identify all the airports in the United States that do and do not have a Gate 13. I also take the opportunity to make an enthusiastic airport hotdog recommendation.

Finally, if the horrendous fires allow, next month I will be coming to the western offices of the Center for Inquiry in Los Angeles to give a talk on, “The Latest in Autism Claptrap.” The event will be on Sunday, February 16 at 11:00 am PT. For anyone who is in the area and would like to attend, the details can be found here.

That’s all for now. Stay safe.

SV

It is decidedly autumn now. Here in New England, there is no avoiding the fact that summer is over. The leaves are not yet at their peak of fiery exuberance, but it won’t be long. I have managed to keep swimming in the ocean for now, but it is unclear how long that will last. Brrrr.

This will be a brief missive. I am back from my trip to England, where I gave two talks, both in pubs. I managed to see three plays—one by Tom Stoppard and two by Shakespeare (not too shabby!)—and visit several museums. I also shared a few meals with friends while there. The weather and accommodations were all quite good. It was generally a very successful trip, and one of the results was my most recent “Behavior & Belief” column for Skeptical Inquirer, entitled “Science and Pseudoscience in London: A Skeptic’s Tour.” I have a particular interest in the history of 19th-century spiritualism, and, although the movement began in the United States, two important spiritualist organizations were established in England, both of which remain in operation today. I visited both of them—as well as a spiritualist archive at the Cambridge University library—and came across some interesting artifacts.

The November/December issue of the print edition of Skeptical Inquirer—with an election-themed cover—will be on newsstands soon, and it will include both a “Behavior & Belief” column and a feature story from me. The column is a reprint of my recent online article “How Does the Ouija Board Work?” and the feature story is a reprint of an article on the Netflix documentary, “Tell Them You Love Me,” that covers the shocking sexual abuse case of former Rutgers University philosophy professor, Anna Stubblefield. The article originally appeared on Colin Wright’s substack Reality’s Last Stand and can be found online here.

That’s it for now. Happy autumn to those who celebrate.

SV

As I write this, summer still has a month to go here in southern New England, but we are well into August, the month most people think of as the last month of summer. I cannot speak for you, but it seems to me the time has zipped by too quickly.

I will be going on a long-anticipated vacation in England in a couple of weeks, and although I will be touristing most of the time, I will also be giving a couple of talks: both in pubs. On Tuesday, September 10, I will be hosted by the Cambridge Skeptics at The Maypole in Cambridge. See below.

Then, the following night, I will be hosted by the Greenwich Skeptics in the Pub at the Star of Greenwich. These are in-person talks, and as far as I know, they will not be recorded or live-streamed. But if any friends within the sound of my voice plan to be in the area of Cambridge or London on those nights, I would love to see you. Both events are free.

Since I last communicated with you, I have written two online columns for Skeptical Inquirer magazine on related themes. In several previous columns, I have written about the discredited communication method facilitated communication, which is often used with nonspeaking people with severe autism. The technique involves a “facilitator” “steadying” the hand of the nonspeaking person as they type on a keyboard, but research shows that the facilitator is unconsciously controlling the typing, not the nonspeaking person. To explain how this works, I have frequently described it as similar to a Ouija board. After giving this somewhat unsatisfying explanation a few times, I decided to devote a column to the question “How does the Ouija board work?” I managed to include mention of a local hero in my town, the poet James Merrill, a Pulitzer Prize winner and Ouija board devotee.

Pamunkey Regional Jail in Hanover County, Virginia where Kevin Plantan spent ten months.

My most recent column, “A Life Shattered by Pseudoscience,” is probably the most important thing I have written for Skeptical Inquirer. Kevin Plantan was jailed for ten months because of false accusations that he sexually abused his nonspeaking autistic daughter. The accusations were made in facilitated communication sessions with home health aides and with the girl’s mother, Kevin’s ex-wife. Kevin has been reluctant to come forward to tell his story, but he agreed to let me write about his case and gave me extraordinary access to people, court documents, and other materials. His story is a human tragedy that could have been averted if investigators had been informed about facilitated communication. The article runs to over 4,000 words and is based on several hours of interviews and extensive research into the case. Kevin’s story and others like his are an important contrast to the typical fluff pieces written about this pseudoscientific communication technique.

That’s it for now. Chances are I will not clutter your inbox again until after my trip to England in early September. Until then, make the best of these waning days of summer.

SV